650 Ti Vs 750 Ti
Price now 199$ Games supported 68% Cost now 277$ Games supported 72% Comparison of graphics carte du jour architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To go the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of functioning, merely for precise assessment y'all have to consider their benchmark and gaming examination results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'south interface and passenger vehicle (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of retentivity installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no defended VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. Equally a rule, data in this section is precise just for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if yous need some detail engineering science for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark operation comparing. Annotation that overall criterion functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, simply if you find some perceived inconsistencies, experience complimentary to speak upwardly in comments section, nosotros commonly fix problems quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing 4 dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions nine, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% Burn down Strike is a DirectX 11 criterion for gaming PCs. It features ii separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery animate being seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 13% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from eleven different exam scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'southward processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 dissimilar examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'due south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Criterion coverage: 5% This is a special criterion measuring graphics carte du jour performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., bachelor either as a standalone programme, or every bit a plugin for 3DS Max, Picture palace 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares return times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nix to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Let'southward see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti since it shows better performance. Should you still accept questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments section, and nosotros shall answer. Do you call up we are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 650 Ti from AMD is Radeon HD 6850 X2, which is most equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 650 Ti: We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 750 Ti from AMD is Radeon HD 7850, which is slower by two% and lower by 11 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 750 Ti: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with operation more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here y'all can meet the user rating of the graphics cards, equally well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti on a scale of ane to v: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a calibration of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS650 Ti vs 750 Ti
General info
Identify in performance rating 440 319 Value for money 1.76 3.06 Compages Kepler (2012−2018) Maxwell (2014−2018) GPU code proper noun GK106 GM107 Marketplace segment Desktop Desktop Release date 9 October 2012 (ix years agone) 18 February 2014 (8 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $149 $149 Price now $199 (1.3x MSRP) $277 (1.9x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 no data CUDA cores 768 640 Core clock speed 928 MHz no data Boost clock speed no information 1085 MHz Number of transistors ii,540 million one,870 meg Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 110 Watt no information Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C no data Texture fill rate 59.ii billion/sec 43.40 Floating-point performance one,425 gflops 1,389 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Jitney support PCI Express iii.0 PCI Express three.0 Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 5.7" (14.five cm) 5.7" (14.5 cm) Height 4.376" (eleven.1 cm) iv.376" (xi.1 cm) Width two-slot no data Supplementary ability connectors I 6-pivot no data Memory
Memory type GDDR5 no data Maximum RAM amount one GB no information Memory passenger vehicle width 128 Bit 128 Bit Retentiveness clock speed 5.iv GB/s 5.4 GB/s Retentivity bandwidth 86.4 GB/s 86.four GB/s Shared memory no data - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI Multi monitor support 4 Displays four displays HDMI + no data HDCP + + Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536 Audio input for HDMI Internal Internal Technologies
3D Blu-Ray + no data Blu Ray 3D no information + 3D Gaming + + 3D Vision + + 3D Vision Live no data + API support
DirectX 12 (11_0) no data Shader Model 5.one 5.i OpenGL 4.3 no data OpenCL 1.2 no data Vulkan ane.1.126 ane.1.126 CUDA + + Criterion performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 49 Mh/southward 183 Mh/due south Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.26 Gh/south 0.51 Gh/southward Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 5 Mh/s 2.3 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.one kh/southward 0.25 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 74.four Sol/s Gaming performance
Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 8.54 13.18 Novelty 9 October 2012 18 February 2014
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 650 Ti by AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 750 Ti past AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-650-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-750-Ti
0 Response to "650 Ti Vs 750 Ti"
Post a Comment